ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Extensive efforts have been directed toward developing an effective vaccine to fight against the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, hesitancy to receive COVID-19 vaccinations has become detrimental to overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the U.S. Military instated a COVID-19 vaccine mandate, some members were still hesitant to receive the vaccine. To determine the efficacy of a program focused on vaccine hesitation, a program evaluation was conducted on a COVID-19 vaccine educational intervention (hereafter COVID-19 Educational Presentation) for trainees at Lackland Air Force Base, TX, in September 2021. Objectives of the educational session included (1) determining the participants' level of confidence that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective, (2) understanding the concern for long-term side effects from COVID-19 vaccinations, and (3) identifying the driving forces behind hesitancy to receive a COVID-19 vaccination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed data collected from the COVID-19 Vaccine Educational Presentation; it consisted of a PowerPoint presentation addressing common questions and myths about COVID-19 vaccines. A survey instrument called the COVID-19 Hesitancy and Confidence Survey was created to assess attitudes to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. RESULTS: Two voluntary COVID-19 Educational Presentations were given in September 2, 2021, months prior to the Air Force's COVID-19 vaccine mandate deadline; 128 trainees participated in the assessment surveys. Overall, the educational intervention increased confidence to receive the COVID-19 vaccine increased by 12.6% (t = -7.928, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 Educational Presentation increased confidence and decreased hesitancy to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccine educational programs should continue in the military population to help combat misinformation and ensure that our military force is fully vaccinated and able to maintain mission readiness.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Examine use of office resources by primary care patients who were initially evaluated through telehealth, telephone, or in-person encounters. METHODS: Retrospective electronic health record review on patients seen in March 2020 for evaluation of potential COVID-19 symptoms, to assess the total number of interactions with physicians and office staff. RESULTS: Of 202 patients, 89 (44%) had initial telehealth, 55 (27%) telephone, and 52 (26%) in-person encounters. Patients initially evaluated through telehealth, telephone, and in-person encounters had a mean of 6.1 (S.D. = 3.7), 5.2 (S.D. = 3.6), and 4.5 (S.D. = 3.0) total interactions with the office, respectively (P = .03), and 9%, 12.7%, and 19.2%, respectively, had a subsequent in-person or emergency department visit (P = .22). Multivariable analysis showed no differences in number of office interactions based on initial visit type; older patients (95% CI = 0.00-0.07) and those with subjective fevers (95% CI = 1.01-3.01) or shortness of breath (95% CI = 0.23-2.28) had more interactions with the office. CONCLUSION: Primary care providers used virtual visits to care for most patients presenting with potential COVID-19 symptoms, with many patients choosing telephone over telehealth visits. Virtual visits can successfully limit patient exposure to other people, and consideration could be given to increasing its use for patients with potential symptoms of COVID-19.